CD24 in Head and Neck Malignancies-An Uprising Biomarker?

INTRODUCTION: CD24 is often overexpressed in human tumors as a regulator of cell migration, invasion and proliferation. It has been associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance in laryngeal cancer. In oral cavity tumors, it was correlated with better overall survival. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of CD24 in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) as a potential marker for head and neck malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CD24/CD11b expression in peripheral blood leukocytes (PBLs) of head and neck cancer patients and matched healthy controls was analyzed via flow cytometry. Tumors and healthy tissues were immune-stained for CD24 expression and the intensity of stain was ranked. Clinical data including tumor site, size, locoregional or metastatic spread, histopathological characteristics and recurrence events were analyzed. RESULTS: CD24 expression in PBLs was significantly higher in a cohort of 101 head and neck cancer patients compared with 101 matched healthy controls (26.9 ± 12.9 vs. 22.4 ± 13.8; p = 0.02). No significant differences in CD24 levels in PBLs were found between different head and neck subsites involved with malignancy. Higher CD24 levels did not correlate with any adverse feature, i.e., perineural invasion or lymphovascular invasion, advanced T stage or regional spread. Immunohistochemistry analysis demonstrated that CD24 was highly expressed in tumor tissue in comparison to healthy surrounding tissue. CONCLUSIONS: CD24 is a possible uprising marker for tumor identification, overexpressed in PBLs and is intensely stained in tumor tissue and pre-malignant lesions. Tumor-PBLs should be further studied.

Re-evaluation of modifiable risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury in a real-world setting.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to identify modifiable risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in primiparous women. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of primiparous women with a singleton vaginal delivery. Main outcome measures were incidence of OASI and odds ratios for possible risk factors: maternal age, body mass index and height, fetal birthweight and head circumference, gestational age, epidural analgesia, mediolateral episiotomy, and instrumental deliveries. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed using forward methods for variable selection. RESULTS: Of 19,786 primiparous women with a singleton vaginal delivery, 369 sustained an OASI (1.9%). Risk factors were identified: vacuum extraction (adjusted OR 2.06, 95% CI, 1.59-2.65, p < 0.001), increased fetal weight (aOR 1.06, 95% CI, 1.02-1.11, p = 0.002, per 100-g increments); head circumference (aOR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.13-1.35, p < 0.001, per 1-cm increments); gestational week (aOR 1.11, 95% CI, 1.02-1.2, p = 0.012, per week). Protective factors: mediolateral episiotomy (aOR 0.75, 95% CI, 0.59-0.94, p = 0.013) particularly in vacuum deliveries (aOR 0.50, 95% CI, 0.29-0.97, p = 0.040); epidural analgesia (aOR 0.64, 95% CI, 0.48-0.84, p = 0.001); maternal height ≥157 cm (aOR 0.97, 95% CI, 0.96-0.98, p = 0.006, risk decreases by 2.6% per 1 cm increase in height). CONCLUSIONS: Mediolateral episiotomy was protective against OASI in both spontaneous and instrumental deliveries of primiparae. Increased fetal weight and large fetal head circumference, particularly in short women, were significant risk factors. These findings support the performance of ultrasound to acquire updated fetal measures before admission to the labor ward.

Unilateral Increase of Gustatory Thresholds in Acute Otitis Media: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate chorda tympani nerve function as measured by unilateral increases of gustatory thresholds in the presence of ipsilateral acute otitis media. METHODS: Prospective clinical study comparing electrogustometric measurements was conducted to evaluate the taste thresholds of each side of the tongue in a patient during an acute episode of unilateral acute otitis media. Included were patients aged 12-40 who presented to the emergency department and outpatient ear, nose, and throat clinic of a university-affiliate tertiary medical center with unilateral acute otitis media between January 2019 and January 2020 and consented to the study. RESULTS: Eleven patients were initially recruited into the study, and 10 patients aged (mean ± standard deviation) 26.1 ± 11.2 years comprised the final study group. Taste thresholds were significantly elevated on the side ipsilateral to the ear affected by acute otitis media (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Chorda tympani nerve conductance is impaired during the acute stage of acute otitis media. This may have implications in the understanding of peripheral neural properties during acute middle ear inflammatory conditions and on the diagnosis of acute otitis media.

Is Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss an Otologic Emergency? Evidence-Based Cutoff for Optimal Treatment Initiation for Sudden Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Case Series and Meta-Analyses.

OBJECTIVES: To study the need for defining unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) as an otologic emergency and establish an evidence-based cutoff for treatment initiation for optimal outcome. METHODS: A systematic literature search of "MEDLINE" via "PubMed," "Embase," and "Web of Science" and original case series comparing the outcome of steroidal treatment for ISSNHL as a function of delays of patient presentation, of diagnosis, and of treatment initiation. Total delay was defined as days from ISSNHL onset to first steroidal dose and divided into up to 3 days, up to 7 days, up to 14 days, and >14 days. RESULTS: The literature search identified 1,469 ears and our original case series contributed 154 ears suitable for study inclusion, resulting in 1,623 ears for statistical analysis. An odds ratio (OR) of 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.71) was calculated for recovery if treatment had been initiated within the third day since the sudden occurrence of a unilateral hearing loss compared with treatment initiation on or after the fourth day (I 2 = 40.1%). The calculated OR for recovery was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.26-0.47) when treatment was initiated during the first 7 days after the sudden hearing loss onset compared with a delay of 8 days or more (I 2 = 52.1%). The OR was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.21-0.46) when treatment was initiated during the first 14 days after the event compared with a longer delay (I 2 = 0.0%). CONCLUSION: Unilateral ISSNHL should be considered a medical emergency. Initiating treatment before 3 days have elapsed since the event portends the best outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

The optimal cutoff value for levator-urethra gap measurements using tomographic ultrasound imaging in avulsion diagnosis is population specific.

AIMS: The levator-urethra gap (LUG), the distance between the urethral lumen center and levator insertion on the inferior pubic rami, can be used for diagnosing levator avulsion, with a previously suggested cutoff of LUG ≥2.5 cm. The aim of this study is to determine an optimal cutoff value for LUG measurements in a high-risk patient population. METHODS: Women followed prospectively after sustaining obstetric anal sphincter injury underwent an interview pelvic examination questionnaires and four-dimensional-transperineal ultrasound examination. Levator avulsion was diagnosed on contraction using tomographic ultrasound imaging. Ultrasound datasets were analyzed offline at a later time blinded to previous data. LUG was measured on each side of the three central slices, yielding six measurements and the highest available value was obtained on each side. Different cutoffs were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and Youden's test. The cutoff was validated against symptoms and signs, and sonographic findings using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 618 complete datasets were available for analysis, median age 29 years, median body mass index of 23.4 kg/m2 , parity 1, and 26.4% instrumental deliveries. Youden's test and ROC curve analysis gave the best area under the curve of 0.869 for a cutoff of 2.305 (95% confidence interval, 0.839-0.9). Women diagnosed with avulsion based on this cutoff were more symptomatic, whereas using larger cutoffs missed more avulsion defects. CONCLUSION: LUG measurement is useful but should be individualized to the population studied, in our case, in a high-risk population, 2.305 cm was the optimal cutoff. Using larger cutoffs may be more specific but is likely to miss more cases.